← Back to homeFAQ / Steelman

Honest answers.
Strongest critiques.

A field guide should be able to link its critics. Here is what Perihelion is, what it isn't, and the strongest arguments against it.

The basics

What is Perihelion?

A community-built field guide for the people who ship on Solana. It is an index of tools, notes, and open calls, not a feed.

Who curates it?

A small editorial team. The open call adds entries; inclusion is not endorsement. Every entry carries a checked date.

Do I need the token?

No. The token is one way to support the work; it is not required to read, submit, or take part.

Is this financial advice?

No. Nothing here is a recommendation or a promise. Crypto assets are high-risk; you can lose what you put in.

Why Solana?

Because the builders we want to index are here. This site is not a claim that Solana is only for one kind of application.

What is the Signal Lab?

A visual encoding, not encryption. The encoder runs in your browser; an image reader is not part of this edition.

Steelman: the strongest critiques

1. “It’s just another token site.”

Fair. The token is one section; the index is the product. Judge it by the entries, the sources, and whether it helps you find something useful.

2. “Curation is gatekeeping.”

Every index has a point of view. We publish the criteria, the checked date, and an open call; inclusion is not paid.

3. “A market card invites speculation.”

The card shows facts with a source and an as-of. There is no price target, no wallet, no swap, and no promise. If that still isn't for you, the rest of the site works without it.

4. “The glyph tool is a gimmick.”

Maybe. It is also a way to leave with something, and a test of whether an index can be playful without becoming a feed. The encoder is a visual encoding, not encryption.

Where to go next

Back to the field index ↗ · Read the ship log ↗

PERIHELION · EDITION 01